Improving Student Learning Achievement through Group Guidance in Natural and Social Sciences Subjects at MI Maraqitta'limat Lengkok Lendang

Authors

  • Harsini MI Maraqitta'limat Lengkok Lendang Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62945/deeplearning.v1i1.197

Keywords:

Group counseling, student achievement, Natural and Social Sciences, holistic education

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of group counseling in improving student achievement in the subject of Natural and Social Sciences at MI Maraqitta’limat Lengkok Lendang. The research is grounded in the growing need for innovative educational approaches that address not only academic content but also students’ motivation, collaboration skills, and personal development. Utilizing a classroom action research (CAR) method, the study was conducted in two cycles, each consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. The subjects were fifth-grade students who demonstrated low academic performance and limited participation in classroom activities. Data collection methods included tests, observations, field notes, and student interviews. The results indicate a significant improvement in student learning outcomes after the implementation of group counseling. In Cycle I, only 56% of students reached the minimum competency standard, whereas in Cycle II, this number increased to 87%. Furthermore, qualitative data revealed an increase in students’ motivation, self-confidence, and ability to work cooperatively with peers. The findings suggest that group counseling is an effective strategy to enhance not only academic achievement but also affective and social aspects of learning. Therefore, it is recommended that educators consider incorporating group counseling techniques into their teaching practices, especially in subjects that require critical thinking and interpersonal skills. This research contributes to the broader discourse on holistic education and offers practical implications for teachers, school counselors, and educational policymakers aiming to foster inclusive and supportive learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath.

Gladding, S. T. (2015). Groups: A counseling specialty (7th ed.). Pearson.

Hidayat, R. (2021). Holistic learning strategies in Islamic schools: An empirical review. International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences, 2(4), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i4.123

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Sage Publications.

Miller, R. (2000). Caring for new life: Essays on holistic education. Foundation for Educational Renewal.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wentzel, K. R., & Muenks, K. (2016). Motivation in context: Social relationships and achievement motivation in the classroom. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 241–261). Routledge.

Yusuf, S., & Nurihsan, J. (2018). Bimbingan dan konseling: Teori dan praktik di sekolah (Revisi ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Improving Student Learning Achievement through Group Guidance in Natural and Social Sciences Subjects at MI Maraqitta’limat Lengkok Lendang. (2025). DEEP LEARNING: Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.62945/deeplearning.v1i1.197