Small Group Discussion Strategies Reviewed to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Civics Learning at MI Sultan Agung

Authors

  • Wahyu Rustyaningsih MI Sultan Agung Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62945/deeplearning.v1i1.202

Keywords:

Small group discussion, learning strategies, learning outcomes

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of small group learning strategies in improving student learning outcomes in Civics Education at MI Sultan Agung. Civics, as a subject, plays a crucial role in shaping students' character, sense of responsibility, and awareness of democratic values. However, traditional teaching methods often result in passive student participation and low academic performance. To address this issue, this research implemented a classroom action research (CAR) approach consisting of two cycles, each comprising planning, action, observation, and reflection. The subjects of the study were fifth-grade students at MI Sultan Agung, totaling 28 participants. Data collection techniques included observation, tests, and documentation. The findings indicate a significant improvement in student learning outcomes after applying small group learning strategies. In the first cycle, the average student learning outcome reached 68.21, with 60.71% of students achieving the minimum mastery criterion (MMC). In the second cycle, the average score increased to 82.14, with 89.29% of students achieving the MMC. Furthermore, student engagement and participation in the learning process showed marked improvement, indicating that small group strategies promote collaboration, active learning, and critical thinking. These results support the conclusion that small group learning is an effective pedagogical approach for enhancing both cognitive and affective learning outcomes in Civics Education. This study contributes to the growing body of research advocating for student-centered learning environments and highlights the importance of interactive teaching methods in primary education. The implementation of small group learning is recommended as a sustainable strategy to improve educational quality, particularly in the context of civic education, where active student involvement is essential. Future research may explore the long-term impact of this strategy and its application across different subjects and educational settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fauzi, A., & Sahabuddin, R. (2021). Character education in the curriculum of Islamic elementary schools in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(2), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i2.19023

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Hattie, J. (2015). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hoskins, B., & Janmaat, J. G. (2019). Education, democracy and inequality: Political engagement and citizenship education in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.

Ismail, M. B., Yusof, N. M., & Zain, M. Z. M. (2020). Cooperative learning and character education: The roles of group interaction in moral reasoning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.6

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Active Learning—Beyond the Future, 1(1), 1–18.

Kagan, S. (2015). Kagan cooperative learning. Kagan Publishing.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.

Nurhayati, N., Raharjo, T. J., & Prasetyo, T. (2022). Student-centered learning approach in Islamic education: A case study in Indonesian Madrasah. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15110a

Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201

UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Chan, A. G., De, T., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2014). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001

Zhou, M., & Brown, D. (2017). Educational learning theories: 2nd edition. Education Open Textbooks. https://oer.galileo.usg.edu/education-textbooks/1

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Small Group Discussion Strategies Reviewed to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Civics Learning at MI Sultan Agung. (2025). DEEP LEARNING: Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.62945/deeplearning.v1i1.202

Similar Articles

11-20 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.