Efforts to Improve the Curiosity of Early Childhood Education Students by Implementing an Inquiry Approach at RA Al-Ma'soem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62945/deeplearning.v1i4.277Keywords:
Inquiry Approach, Curiosity, Early Childhood Education, Classroom Action Research, Islamic EducationAbstract
This study aimed to improve the curiosity of early childhood education students through the implementation of an inquiry-based learning approach at RA Al-Ma'soem. Curiosity is an essential foundation for children’s cognitive development and active learning, yet classroom observations revealed that many students showed low enthusiasm in asking questions, exploring learning materials, and responding critically to teacher stimulation. This research employed Classroom Action Research (CAR) consisting of two cycles, each including the stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The participants were 20 students of early childhood education (aged 5–6 years) at RA Al-Ma'soem. Data were collected through observation sheets, teacher field notes, and documentation. The main indicator of success was the percentage of students demonstrating curiosity behaviors, including asking questions, exploring objects, expressing opinions, and responding to learning challenges. The findings showed a significant improvement in students’ curiosity after applying the inquiry approach. In the pre-cycle stage, the average curiosity achievement was 45% (low category). After the implementation in Cycle I, the curiosity level increased to 65% (moderate category). Furthermore, in Cycle II, the curiosity achievement reached 85% (high category), indicating that most students actively engaged in inquiry activities such as observing, questioning, experimenting, and communicating findings. The inquiry approach also increased students’ participation, confidence, and motivation during Islamic learning activities. Therefore, it can be concluded that the inquiry approach is effective in enhancing curiosity among early childhood learners and can be recommended as an innovative learning strategy in Islamic early childhood education institutions.
Downloads
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.
Chouinard, M. M. (2007). Children’s questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(1), 1–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x
Engel, S. (2011). Children’s need to know: Curiosity in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.h054131316473115
Engel, S. (2015). The hungry mind: The origins of curiosity in childhood. Harvard Educational Review, 85(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.1.1
Halstead, J. M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Hussain, A. (2007). Islamic education: The concept of knowledge and education in Islam. Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 1–10.
Kashdan, T. B., Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., & McKnight, P. E. (2018). The five-dimensional curiosity scale: Capturing the bandwidth of curiosity and identifying four unique subgroups of curious people. Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.011
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academy Press.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Rizvi, F. (2007). Islam, education and globalisation: The continuing debate. In R. Hefner & M. Qasim Zaman (Eds.), Schooling Islam: The culture and politics of modern Muslim education (pp. 1–20). Princeton University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Suyanto, S. (2005). Dasar-dasar pendidikan anak usia dini. Hikayat Publishing.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
