Implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning Model to Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding in Science Learning at MIN 5 Lhokseumawe

Authors

  • Putri Salma MIN 5 Lhokseumawe Author
  • Susanti Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62945/deeplearning.v1i4.280

Keywords:

Contextual Teaching and Learning, conceptual understanding, science learning, elementary education

Abstract

This study aims to improve students’ conceptual understanding in science learning through the implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model at MIN 5 Lhokseumawe. The research employed Classroom Action Research (CAR) consisting of two cycles, with each cycle involving four stages: planning, action, observation, and reflection. The participants were 28 fifth-grade students at MIN 5 Lhokseumawe during the 2024/2025 academic year. Data were collected through conceptual understanding tests, observation sheets of teacher and student activities, and field notes. The indicators of conceptual understanding included students’ ability to explain scientific concepts, classify objects based on characteristics, provide examples of concepts, and apply concepts in daily life contexts. The findings revealed a significant improvement in students’ conceptual understanding after the application of CTL. In the pre-cycle phase, only 10 out of 28 students (35.71%) achieved the minimum mastery criterion (MMC = 75), with an average score of 68.21. After the implementation of CTL in Cycle I, the number of students who achieved mastery increased to 18 students (64.29%) with an average score of 75.46. Furthermore, Cycle II showed stronger improvement, with 25 students (89.29%) achieving mastery and the average score rising to 84.32. Observation results also indicated improvements in learning engagement, where student activity increased from 70.15% in Cycle I to 87.60% in Cycle II, while teacher performance improved from 76.40% to 90.25%. These results confirm that the CTL model effectively enhances students’ conceptual understanding in science learning by connecting scientific content with real-life situations, promoting active participation, and encouraging meaningful learning experiences. Therefore, CTL is recommended as an effective instructional approach for improving conceptual understanding in science education at the elementary Islamic school level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Azra, A. (2017). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan milenium III. Kencana.

Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing students for the new economy. The Highlight Zone Research @ Work. National Dissemination Center for Career and Technical Education.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.

Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Kogan Page.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.

Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Routledge.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Glynn, S. M., & Winter, L. K. (2004). Contextual teaching and learning of science in elementary schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173645

Hidayat, N. (2019). Islamic education in Aceh: The role of culture and local wisdom in strengthening learning practices. Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 7(1), 45–60.

Hudson, C. C., & Whisler, V. R. (2008). Contextual teaching and learning for practitioners. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 6(4), 54–58.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.

Mills, G. E. (2018). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (6th ed.). Pearson.

National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.

Nurhadi. (2004). Pembelajaran kontekstual dan penerapannya dalam KBK. Universitas Negeri Malang Press.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Sears, S. J. (2003). Introduction to contextual teaching and learning. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific literacy. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2227–2237. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/85435

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Implementation of the Contextual Teaching and Learning Model to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Science Learning at MIN 5 Lhokseumawe. (2025). DEEP LEARNING: Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.62945/deeplearning.v1i4.280

Similar Articles

21-30 of 46

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.