Scaffolding Method in Improving Islamic Education Learning Outcomes on the Material of Caring for Orphans at SD Negeri 100620 Pasar Simundol
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62945/jitdr.v1i1.40Keywords:
Scaffolding method, learning outcomes, Islamic educationAbstract
This study aims to improve the learning outcomes of Islamic Religious Education regarding caring for orphans in grade V students of SD Negeri 100620 Pasar Simundol through the application of the scaffolding method. This research method uses a qualitative approach with a classroom action research design. The results of the study indicate that the scaffolding method can improve students' understanding of the material, as well as build empathy for orphans. With gradual support, students find it easier to understand the concepts and values taught, and are more active in class discussions. In addition, changes in students' attitudes towards orphans have become more positive, with an increase in empathy and social concern that is clearly visible. Data were obtained through classroom observations, interviews with students and teachers, and written tests to measure cognitive understanding. Data analysis showed a significant increase in student engagement and their understanding of the material. Data triangulation confirmed the consistency of the findings, strengthening the validity of the research results. These findings indicate that the scaffolding method is an effective tool for improving student learning outcomes and empathy in Islamic Religious Education learning, and can be adopted as an effective learning method in other schools with similar characteristics.
Downloads
References
Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. Jossey-Bass.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.
Gibbs, G. (2012). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Sage Publications.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company.
John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3-4), 191-206.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). Cooperation and the Use of Technology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 471-490). Cambridge University Press.
Karpov, Y. V. (2003). Vygotsky’s doctrine of scientific concepts: Its role for contemporary education. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 36-44.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Permendikbud No. 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on Moral Development, Vol. II: The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper & Row.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Harvard University Press.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Moll, L. C. (1990). Vygotsky and Education: Instructional Implications and Applications of Sociohistorical Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Pappas, C. (2014). Instructional scaffolding: A definition. eLearning Industry. Available at: elearningindustry.com
Piaget, J. (1971). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Viking Press.
Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford University Press.
Santrock, J. W. (2014). Educational Psychology. McGraw-Hill Education.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson.
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Allyn & Bacon.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications.
Tudge, J. R. H., & Scrimsher, S. (2003). Lev Vygotsky on education: A cultural-historical, interpersonal, and individual approach to development. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational Psychology: A Century of Contributions (pp. 207-228). Erlbaum.
Van Oers, B. (1998). The fallacy of decontextualization. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(2), 135-142.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvard University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Erlbaum.
Zull, J. E. (2002). The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching Teaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning. Stylus Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Pendidikan Dasar. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
